1. flat frequency response at the listening position

  2. minimum number of crossover components

    In the late 1990's, largely due to the work published by Dr. Floyd Toole while he was with the NRC in Canada, three more design goals were added:

  3. the antiphase curve should approach a null

  4. off axis frequency response can have dips but should not have peaks, and the off-axis frequency response should not peak above the on-axis frequency response

    To this set of design goals I generally add two more:

  5. driver voltage plots should be monotonic (decreasing for low pass, increasing for high pass)

  6. minimum system impedance should never be lower than the driver DC resistance

 

To: George Short

George,

How are you doing? By the looks of your web site, quite well.

I couldn't help but to read through the discussion of the Apogee Stage and
the good work you did on a revised crossover. It would be a thrill to hear
it. I wanted to make a couple simple points on your discussion: the Apogee
Stage was developed using some rather sophisticated time windowing
techniques using a B&K spectrum analyzer with special test setups made by
Steve Temme. We looked specifically at major and minor reflection effects
from cabinetry, etc. Also, we were very concerned with providing uniform
group delay and precise impulse response. The crossover was designed using
one of the most sophisticated electronic CAD simulation packages available
at that time called MicroCap. The listening evaluations were used to fine
tune the musicality and select brands of crossover components.

Drop me a line sometime.

Your friend,

Mark

Mark Nazar
Director of OEM Automotive Product Development
Boston Acoustics

 

George,

I wanted to send you a quick note to let you know that the Stage crossover upgrade I purchased nearly two years ago still continues to impress me. The speakers get better with every improvement I've made to the electronics.

Rick

 

 

Hi George,

I have been so consumed by work that I never got a chance to write
anything up.
Hope all is well.
Everytime I turn on my stereo I keep reminding myself to thank you.

Here are some notes on my feelings about the Stage,
pre & post NorthCreek Crossover.

It's not an excited auditioner with a new toy, it's true.

Stock:
Metallic strings
Brass sounds thin and squeaky
Hashy sound when cranked up
No matter where you place it there is always a hump and a trough in the
bass
Sibilant sounds annoying
images, while very well defined an separated
have no body, no bloom of each instrument

Post NorthCreek
Fast bass, with the right amount of undertones but not boomy like the
Duettas (even when I had KSA300S) which
go deep but tend to overhwhelm the room with certain frequencies
Still sound a bit drier than my reference Eidolons but its close
Piano music is simply magical, no more honky tonk xylophone sound
Crank it up, and the speakers disappear and your ears won't bleed :)
Details details details, the closest to my ESL989s than anything else!
Body! Images are stable and full-bodied without being muddy

I simply cannot thank you enough!!!

-Johnson

 Dear George, Windy et al,

The crossovers are a complete success. I've been using some 'substitute'
Acurus amplifiers and generic wires while waiting for upgrades on the Van
Alstines. I thought the sound was recessed and maybe too reticent after the
modifications, but after some break-in time, the magic is back again -- even
more so, thank you again. They will be appreciated in our home
indefinitely.

Bill and Sandy



>
> Dear George,
>
> Firstly I would like to apologize for taking so long to let you know if
> the crossovers arrived safely.
> They did! On the 11th of October I collected them at the post office where
> I paid 200 + euros import duties or taxes.
>
> I balanced them on the back of my cycle as my daughter had borrowed our
> car for two weeks.
>
> Home safely I unpacked the huge box and they were undamaged.
>
> In one of the crossovers, see image called DSC02440JPG, there seems to be
> an extra capacitor. Was this added to balance the sound, to match the
> crossovers or to make up for some short comings? Or for a difference in
> the output/frequency balance of the crossover?
>
> My old crossover is in not in to good a state with tape used to hold the
> woofer inductor together. See image.
>
> I decided very stubbornly not to lay the speakers flat to install the
> crossovers because I don't like moving them too much.
> This meant that it was more difficult to install them on my own. But by
> putting some books underneath the crossovers while I connected them I was
> able to manage. Only one of the screws I couldn't quite manage to get it
> lined up or in the hole. The screw is also quite blunt the end is not
> ending in a point, probably because they are custom shortened to suit the
> size they need to be. I don't think that one screw is going to make a
> difference.
>
> The sound was a bit disappointing as expected. Recessed although the lower
> frequencies seemed much more present, better and refineder straight away.
> More details were present all round and the stereo image was better.
> I could hear the possibilities and have been burning in the crossovers for
> something like 50 hours now.
> The last thing to get better were the high frequencies, it was still
> sounding brittle.
>
> Now they make everything sound live. More differentiation of the colour
> tones of instruments, especially obvious with brass sections in big bands.
> The Stages were already beter in this respect compared to my old B&W 801
> mk II's. Great dynamics, were already better from the first hours of play.
> More body in the sound. Double base instruments are now fascinating to
> listen to.
> I have a damaged ear nerve and now it doesn't irritate even when music is
> played louder. Clarinets are still annoying if played too loud. Probably
> due to the damage I have sustained when I used to play the clarinet.
> Today on Sunday, the electricity supply seems to be better, it always does
> sound better on Sundays, the Stages sound almost perfect with huge dynamics
> at a normal volume setting. The base seems to be limited as the Stages
> only go so low but I hardly miss anything especially on Sundays. Maybe I
> can arrange a separate earth pen in the garden sometime for the Hifi.
> Always something to improve. Perhaps the base will improve even more with
> more hours of burning in.
>
> Maybe the Krell amplifier has it's limitations as it is an old design and
> the parts are old + Sphinx pre.
>
> The main point is I am very satisfied and find it value for money and can
> look forward to many hours of music pleasure. Thanks!
> The Stage is certainly a remarkable speaker and your crossover is also
> very special.
>
> I couldn't recommend a better improvement for a Hifi for the price.
>
> I am also proud to own a unique hand made crossover from a respected name
> in Hifi also having had your experiences with Apogee.
>
> Greetings, Russell.
Hello!

First of all, I am very very glad to hear all arrived in good order and
the installation went well.

And we are overjoyed to learn that you are so pleased with them!

They are a little different from the photo, the capacitors are updated and
also the power handling has been increased (if you look closely, you will
see there are three resistors where there used to be two).  The inductor
was also changed to match the upgraded capacitors.  This is the latest
version (officially 2012 revision), same as mine.

They will continue to get better, it takes about 300 hours for the tweeter
capacitors to break in.

My audio system also seems to be best after midnight and on Sunday.

Please keep me updated!

-George